首页> 外文OA文献 >Failure to fail? Practice educators' emotional experiences of assessing failing social work students
【2h】

Failure to fail? Practice educators' emotional experiences of assessing failing social work students

机译:没有失败?实践教育者评估失败的社会工作学生的情感体验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The paper explores issues that arise in the assessment of failing social work students in practice learning settings in England. It draws on existing literature on the topic, as well as on a small empirical study. The qualitative methodology is influenced by practitioner-research paradigms. Based on 20 in-depth interviews with practice educators, the research utilised the voice-centred relational method of data analysis which revealed five distinct ‘emotional stories’, explaining why practice assessors found the process of working with a failing student challenging and difficult. These stories include the ‘guilty story’, ‘angry story’, the ‘what is my role story’, the ‘idealised learner story’ and the ‘internalisation of failure so I couldn't always fail them story’. The paper considers the possible adverse impact on the assessment process of these often unacknowledged emotional responses experienced by practice educators, namely, that there is a very real possibility that students are being passed as competent when the evidence may strongly suggest otherwise. The paper offers some ways forward in light of the findings, linking these to the change process underway in social work education in England but suggesting that these have wider relevance to practice assessment in other contexts
机译:本文探讨了在英格兰实践学习环境中评估失败的社会工作学生时出现的问题。它借鉴了有关该主题的现有文献以及少量的实证研究。定性方法受到从业者研究范式的影响。在对20名实践教育者进行的深入访谈的基础上,该研究采用了以语音为中心的关系数据分析方法,揭示了五个截然不同的“情感故事”,从而解释了为什么实践评估者发现与失败的学生合作的过程具有挑战性和困难性。这些故事包括“内gui的故事”,“生气的故事”,“我的角色是什么”,“理想化的学习者故事”和“失败的内在化,所以我不能总是让他们失败的故事”。本文考虑了实践教育者经常经历的这些未得到认可的情绪反应,对评估过程可能产生不利影响,即,当证据强烈表明存在其他可能性时,很可能通过了学生的胜任。本文根据研究结果提供了一些前进的方法,将其与英格兰社会工作教育中正在进行的变革过程相关联,但建议这些方法与其他情况下的实践评估具有更广泛的相关性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号